MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205995618 · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2948

Reasoned opinion on the setting of new MRLs for penthiopyrad in various crops

2012· article· en· W4205995618 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEFSA Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural safety and regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean commissionAgricultural scienceSunflowerBiotechnologyRisk assessmentBusinessCropPesticide residueEuropean unionToxicologyPesticideBiologyAgronomyComputer scienceInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, The United Kingdom, herewith referred to as the rapporteur Member State (RMS), received an application from the company LKC UK Ltd. to set MRLs for penthiopyrad in a wide range of plant commodities in order to accommodate intended European uses and uses authorized in the United States and Canada. Resulting from the use of penthiopyrad on plants, a need to set MRLs in animal commodities was also identified by the RMS. The RMS drafted an evaluation report according to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, which was submitted to the European Commission and forwarded to EFSA. According to EFSA the data are sufficient to derive MRL proposals for most of the pesticide uses notified to EFSA. EFSA notes that residue trials on maize, oilseed rape, cotton, sunflower and soya have been performed with a genetically modified crop. The applicant has to confirm that the metabolism of penthiopyrad in genetically modified crop proceeds in the same way as in its conventional counterpart. Adequate enforcement methods are available to control the residues of parent penthiopyrad. For the calculated dietary burdens no residues of penthiopyrad would occur in commodities of animal origin above the analytically achievable LOQ. An adequate analytical method is available for the determination of penthiopyrad in milk, eggs, bovine meat and liver at the LOQ of 0.01 mg/kg. Based on the risk assessment results, EFSA concludes that for the notified uses of penthiopyrad on scarole and Chinese cabbage (mustard greens), a potential acute consumer intake concerns cannot be excluded for penthiopyrad residues. Thus the derived MRL proposals are not recommended to be taken over in EU legislation. The penthiopyrad residues expected on the remaining crops under consideration will not result in a consumer exposure exceeding the toxicological reference values for penthiopyrad and therefore is unlikely to pose a public health concern. The risk assessment for the metabolite PAM could not be finalised lacking toxicological data which are required to conclude on the toxicological profile of the metabolite. Since the peer review according to Commission Regulation (EU) No 188/2011 is not yet finalised, the conclusions reached in this reasoned opinion should be taken as provisional and might need to be reconsidered in the light of the outcome of the peer review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it