MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206050044 · doi:10.3390/agronomy12020245

Cation/Proton Antiporter Genes in Tomato: Genomic Characterization, Expression Profiling, and Co-Localization with Salt Stress-Related QTLs

2022· article· en· W4206050044 on OpenAlexaff
Zahid Hussain, Habiba Khan, Muhammad Imran, Muhammad Kashif Naeem, Sabir Hussain Shah, Arshad Iqbal, Syed Shujait Ali, Muhammad Rizwan, Shahid Ali, Muhammad Atif Muneer, Émilie Widemann, Sarfraz Shafiq

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiporterGeneBiologyGeneticsGene familySolanumAbiotic stressQuantitative trait locusPolygeneGene expression profilingCandidate geneGene duplicationPhenotypeGene expressionBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cation/proton antiporter (CPA) family represents a class of transmembrane transporter proteins that play a crucial role in plants during high salinity stress by maintaining the cell’s ionic balance and pH homeostasis. So far, the CPA genes have not been systematically characterized in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). In this study, we identified and analyzed 33 putative CPA genes in tomato. Phylogenetic analysis showed that tomato CPAs could be classified into three subgroups, i.e., CHX (18 genes), KEA (8 genes), and NHX (7 genes). CPA genes within each subgroup shared similar motifs, conserved catalytic domains and gene structure. Further analysis revealed that the CPA genes were unevenly distributed on the chromosomes and segmental duplication events played a major role in the expansion of the CPA gene family in tomato. Gene expression analysis exhibited that CPA genes were differentially expressed in different tissues, various stages of fruit development, and differentially regulated in response to abiotic stresses, especially salt stress. Further, co-localization of tomato CPA genes with quantitative trait loci (QTL) of salt stress-related phenotypes revealed their broader functions in salt stress tolerance. Finally, predicted protein–protein interactions of tomato CPAs, gene ontology analysis, and the presence of putative cis-elements in the promoter further support the diverse role of tomato CPAs in plant development and plant stress tolerance. In brief, this study highlights the potential role of tomato CPAs in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance, especially in salt stress, and provides comprehensive information to explore new candidate genes for salt tolerance in tomato.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomySame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207