MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206078260 · doi:10.1177/20543581211069225

Effect of a Perioperative Hypotension-Avoidance Strategy Versus a Hypertension-Avoidance Strategy on the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Clinical Research Protocol for a Substudy of the POISE-3 Randomized Clinical Trial

2022· article· en· W4206078260 on OpenAlexafffund
Amit X. Garg, Meaghan S. Cuerden, Mohammed Amir, Emilie P. Belley‐Côté, Keyur Bhatt, Bruce Biccard, Flávia K. Borges, Matthew T.V. Chan, David Conen, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Sergey Efremov, John W. Eikelboom, Edith Fleischmann, Giovanni Landoni, Peter L. Gross, Raja Jayaram, М. Yu. Кirov, Ydo V. Kleinlugtenbelt, Andrea Kurz, André Lamy, Kate Leslie, В. В. Лихванцев, В. В. Ломиворотов, Maura Marcucci, María José Martínez‐Zapata, Michael McGillion, William F. McIntyre, Christian S. Meyhoff, Sandra Ofori, Thomas Painter, Pilar Paniagua, Chirag R. Parikh, Joel L. Parlow, Ameen Patel, Carísi Anne Polanczyk, Toby Richards, Pavel S Roshanov, Denis Schmartz, Daniel I. Sessler, Timothy G. Short, Jessica M. Sontrop, Jessica Spence, Sadeesh Srinathan, David Stillo, Wojciech Szczeklik, Vikas Tandon, David Torres, Thomas Van Helder, Jessica Vincent, C. Y. Wang, Michael Ke Wang, Richard Whitlock, Mária Wittmann, Denis Xavier, P.J. Devereaux

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesWestern UniversityUniversity of ManitobaKingston General HospitalPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences Centre
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchInstituto de Salud Carlos IIICanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesKidney Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeRandomized controlled trialAcute kidney injuryClinical trialProtocol (science)Kidney diseaseAnesthesiaIntensive care medicineInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Most patients who take antihypertensive medications continue taking them on the morning of surgery and during the perioperative period. However, growing evidence suggests this practice may contribute to perioperative hypotension and a higher risk of complications. This protocol describes an acute kidney injury substudy of the Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation-3 (POISE-3) trial, which is testing the effect of a perioperative hypotension-avoidance strategy versus a hypertension-avoidance strategy in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a substudy of POISE-3 to determine whether a perioperative hypotension-avoidance strategy reduces the risk of acute kidney injury compared with a hypertension-avoidance strategy. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with 1:1 randomization to the intervention (a perioperative hypotension-avoidance strategy) or control (a hypertension-avoidance strategy). INTERVENTION: If the presurgery systolic blood pressure (SBP) is <130 mmHg, all antihypertensive medications are withheld on the morning of surgery. If the SBP is ≥130 mmHg, some medications (but not angiotensin receptor blockers [ACEIs], angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], or renin inhibitors) may be continued in a stepwise manner. During surgery, the patients' mean arterial pressure (MAP) is maintained at ≥80 mmHg. During the first 48 hours after surgery, some antihypertensive medications (but not ACEIs, ARBs, or renin inhibitors) may be restarted in a stepwise manner if the SBP is ≥130 mmHg. CONTROL: Patients receive their usual antihypertensive medications before and after surgery. The patients' MAP is maintained at ≥60 mmHg from anesthetic induction until the end of surgery. SETTING: Recruitment from 108 centers in 22 countries from 2018 to 2021. PATIENTS: Patients (~6800) aged ≥45 years having noncardiac surgery who have or are at risk of atherosclerotic disease and who routinely take antihypertensive medications. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome of the substudy is postoperative acute kidney injury, defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of either ≥26.5 μmol/L (≥0.3 mg/dL) within 48 hours of randomization or ≥50% within 7 days of randomization. METHODS: . RESULTS: Substudy results will be analyzed in 2022. LIMITATIONS: It is not possible to mask patients or providers to the intervention; however, objective measures will be used to assess acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: This substudy will provide generalizable estimates of the effect of a perioperative hypotension-avoidance strategy on the risk of acute kidney injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.104
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.104
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207