MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proceedings of the 30th Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT

2021· article· en· W4206088044 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCollaboration in agile enterprises
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftSlovenská technická univerzita v BratislaveMoscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyTechnical University of SofiaSamara UniversityUniversität RostockITMO UniversityKazan Federal UniversityUniversità degli Studi di MessinaUniversidade do MinhoUniversità degli Studi di Roma Tor VergataSan José State UniversitySkolkovo Institute of Science and TechnologyOulun YliopistoMultimedia UniversityUniversitat de BarcelonaDong-Eui UniversityUniversitetet i OsloNational Tsing Hua UniversityRussian Academy of SciencesSultan Qaboos UniversityKungliga Tekniska HögskolanUniversity of WestminsterShanghai Educational Development FoundationUniversità degli Studi di TrentoUniversità di PisaFondazione Bruno KesslerLomonosov Moscow State UniversityUniversity of LethbridgeAalto-YliopistoInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA)Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBauman Moscow State Technical UniversityNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsHelsingin YliopistoDeakin UniversityUniversidade da Beira InteriorUniversité de GenèveUniversità degli Studi di MilanoUniversidade Federal do ABCDell EMCSaint Petersburg State UniversityNational Chiao Tung UniversityUniversity of LimerickPrinceton UniversityLatvijas UniversitateJordan University of Science and TechnologyQueen Mary University of LondonUniversity of the West of EnglandInnopolis UniversityTomsk Polytechnic UniversityUniversitat Pompeu FabraUniversità di Bologna
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Computer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicCollaboration in agile enterprisesFrench-language works237,207