GUDERMANNIAN NEURAL NETWORKS TO INVESTIGATE THE LIÉNARD DIFFERENTIAL MODEL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present the numerical solutions of the Liénard nonlinear model by designing the structure of the computational Gudermannian neural networks (GNNs) along with the global/local search efficiencies of genetic algorithms (GAs) and interior-point algorithm (IPA), i.e. GNNs–GAs–IPA. A merit function in terms of differential system and its boundary conditions is designed and optimization is performed by using the proposed computational procedures of GAs–IPA to solve the Liénard nonlinear differential system. Three different highly nonlinear examples based on the Liénard differential system have been tested to check the competence, exactness and proficiency of the proposed computational paradigm of GNNs–GAs–IPA. The statistical performances in terms of different operators have been provided to check the reliability, consistency and stability of the computational GNNs–GAs–IPA. The plots of the absolute error, performance measures, results comparison, convergence analysis based on different operators, histograms and boxplots are also illustrated. Moreover, statistical gauges using minimum, mean, maximum, semi-interquartile range, standard deviation and median are also provided to authenticate the optimal performance of the GNNs–GAs–IPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it