The Early-Stage Corrosion of Copper Materials in Chloride and Sulfide Solutions: Nanoscale Characterization and The Effect of Microstructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microstructures of copper (Cu) materials were investigated by electron backscatter diffraction, showing that electrodeposited (ED) Cu has a homogenous polycrystalline microstructure, while cold spray (CS) Cu has a heterogeneous microstructure with varying grain size, pores, and interfacial splat regions. The corrosion rate was examined by corrosion potential (E CORR ) and polarization resistance (R p ) measurements on Cu specimens in solutions containing 0.1 M NaCl + 1 × 10 −3 M Na 2 S. Although the as sprayed CS-Cu was the least corrosion resistant, the corrosion rate of the heat-treated CS-Cu was similar to that of the ED-Cu and wrought Cu (SKB-Cu). Electrochemical behaviours of Cu materials were investigated by either a potentiodynamic scan or a potentiostatic polarization at a more positive potential (E > E CORR ) for various experiment durations up to 4 h, showing that the heat-treated CS-Cu, SKB-Cu and ED-Cu exhibited very similar behaviour while the as sprayed CS-Cu showed erratic behavior consistent with a variable surface reactivity. Nanoscale scanning transmission electron microscopy analysis has been performed at the cross-section of an anodically-oxidized CS-Cu specimen, revealing a two-layer film structure, mostly composed of Cu sulfide, with a minor diffusion of sulfur in the local area of an interfacial splat boundary tip.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".