MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Fervidobacterium Emendation</i>

2021· other· en· W4206143629 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane L’Haridon, Anne A. Farrell, Olga Zhaxybayeva, Camilla Nesbø

Bibliographic record

VenueBergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermophileHeterotrophBiologyBacteriaCell wallGenusSalinityBiochemistryChemistryBotanyEcologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fer.vi.do.bac.te'ri.um. L. masc. adj. fervidus hot: Gr. neut. n. bakterion a small rod: N.L. neut. n. Fervidobacterium a rod that grow at higher temperatures. The genus Fervidobacterium is currently composed of seven described species ( Fervidobacterium changbaicum , Fervidobacterium gondwanense , Fervidobacterium islandicum , Fervidobacterium nodosum , Fervidobacterium pennivorans , Fervidobacterium riparium , and Fervidobacterium thailandense ). They are members of the phylum Thermotogota , class Thermotogae , order Thermotogales , and family Fervidobacteriaceae . Similar to other Thermotogota , Fervidobacterium spp. are obligately anaerobic heterotrophs . They are thermophilic or hyperthermophilic , with optimum growth temperature of 60–80°C and optimal pH of 6.5–7.8. However, unlike other described Thermotogota , Fervidobacterium spp. grow only at low salinity (0–0.5% NaCl). Sulfur is reduced to H 2 S and stimulates growth, while molecular hydrogen inhibits growth. The cells are Gram‐negative rods and occur individually, in pairs, in filaments, in chains of up to 17 cells in one chain, or as spherical rotund bodies where 10 or more cells share an outer membrane. The majority of the individual cells produce terminal protuberances on one end of the cell (spheroids). Cells size about 0.4–0.6 × 1–40 μm. The cells are sensitive to inhibitors of cell‐wall, protein, and nucleic acid biosynthesis. Known habitats are terrestrial geothermal systems. The genus has also been detected in several types of anthropogenic environments: oil sands, tailing ponds, effluent of pulp and paper industry, and thermophilic microbial fuel cells. Several isolates have important uses in biotechnology; for instance, keratinophilic isolates are known to degrade feathers. DNA G + C content (mol%) : 35–45.8. Type species : Fervidobacterium nodosum Patel et al. 1985, VL19. Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the genus Fervidobacterium is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Thermotogati / Thermotogota / Thermotogae / Thermotogales / Fervidobacteriaceae / Fervidobacterium The genus Fervidobacterium can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as g__Fervidobacterium (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Thermotogota / c__Thermotogae / o__Thermotogales / f__Fervidobacteriaceae / g__Fervidobacterium * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and BacteriaSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207