An Angle Recognition Algorithm for Tracking Moving Targets Using WiFi Signals with Adaptive Spatiotemporal Clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An angle estimation algorithm for tracking indoor moving targets with WiFi is proposed. First, phase calibration and static path elimination are proposed and performed on the collected channel state information signals from different antennas. Then, the angle of arrival information is obtained with the joint estimation algorithm of the angle of arrival (AOA) and time of flight (TOF). To deal with the multipath effects, we adopt the DBscan spatiotemporal clustering algorithm with adaptive parameters. In addition, the time-continuous angle of arrival information is obtained by interpolating and supplementing points to extract the dynamic signal paths better. Finally, the least-squares method is used for linear fitting to obtain the final angle information of a moving target. Experiments are conducted with the tracking data set presented with Tsinghua's Widar 2.0. The results show that the average angle estimation error with the proposed algorithm is smaller than Widar2.0. The average angle error is about 7.18° in the classroom environment, 3.62° in the corridor environment, and 12.16° in the office environment; they are smaller than the errors of the existing system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".