MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206156074 · doi:10.2514/6.2022-0826

OP2A: A Multiphysics Fluid Simulation Framework

2022· article· en· W4206156074 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas J. Greenslade, Nathan Donaldson, Minkwan Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiphysicsComputer scienceComputational scienceDiscretizationFinite volume methodModular designHypersonic speedFinite element methodAerospace engineeringMechanicsPhysicsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-0826.vid A new, modular, open-source framework is presented for the simulation of hypersonic aerothermodynamics. The Open-source multiPhysics framework for Plasma Applications (OP2A) allows for the construction of multiphysics simulations, including all the necessary components for a comprehensive simulation of a body in hypersonic flow. Components currently included allow for the evolution of the Euler or Navier-Stokes equations with finite volume discretisation on linear or axisymmetric block-structured grids. Solutions can be computed to either first or second order accuracy using various numerical methods, together with flux limiting routines to maintain total variation diminishing (TVD) properties and minimise potentially spurious results. OP2A is written in object oriented C++, so as to facilitate the implementation of new modules, allowing OP2A to be forward looking with respect to new methods. The framework currently utilises the MPI and OpenMP libraries for parallel computation, METIS for mesh decomposition, and PLATO (PLAsma in Thermodynamic nOn-equilibrium) for plasma and non-equilibrium chemistry calculations. Other than these specific dependencies, only standard C++ libraries are used in OP2A, meaning that it is highly portable between different hardware architectures. An overview of the OP2A framework, and of the numerical methods included in OP2A is provided. This is followed by details of the simulations – including validation cases – that have been run to date, as well as planned future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA SCITECH 2022 ForumSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207