Novel Analytical Approach for Parameters Identification of PEM Electrolyzer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrochemical modeling is commonly used to model the characteristics of proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer cells where all losses caused during the electrolysis process are taken into account. The model has a nonlinear relationship between current density and voltage ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">J–V</i> ), with five model parameters that are subjected to change depending on the physical properties and chemical conditions of the PEM electrolyzer. In this article, a novel analytical approach based on the least square error method is proposed to estimate the model parameters and characterize the electrochemical behavior of the PEM electrolyzer under various operating conditions. The accuracy and validity of the proposed approach are tested under different case studies at various operating temperatures, output pressures, hydrogen production rates, and sizes of the dataset. Also, the relationship between the estimated parameters and the operating conditions of the PEM electrolyzer is explored. Finally, the superiority of the proposed approach is demonstrated by comparison to numerical and heuristic optimization parameter identification methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".