MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4206181927 · doi:10.1002/alz.053239

Sex‐related differences in cognition with statin usage in a geriatric memory clinic cohort

2021· article· en· W4206181927 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tsz Wai Bentley Lo, Wael K. Karameh, Luis Fornazzari, G Dadone, Angela Golas, Joseph Barfett, David G. Muñoz, Tom A. Schweizer, Corinne E. Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthYork UniversityUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversitySt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRosuvastatinAtorvastatinMedicineCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMemory clinicGeriatric Depression ScalePopulationCohortDementiaStatinActivities of daily livingPsychologyPhysical therapyClinical psychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineCognitive impairmentDepressive symptomsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Recently, there has been debate for the suitability of statins for geriatric populations and patients with dementia as there is evidence suggesting improved quality of life following discontinuation of therapy in these groups, as well as conflicting evidence surrounding its potential to both prevent and potentiate downstream cognitive deficits. Despite large scale studies being conducted in the past regarding statins and cognition, there is a paucity of literature investigating its interaction with sex, as well as possible associations with other variables such as subjective complaints, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and function. Methods Analysis was done on patients assessed at a Memory Disorders Clinic at St. Michael’s Hospital between 2012 and 2017, comprising a population of 348 patients divided into groups taking daily atorvastatin (N = 45), rosuvastatin (N = 40), and controls (N = 263) (Table 1). Data form the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Behavioural Neurology Assessment‐Revised (BNA‐R), Neuropsychological Impairment Scale (NIS), The Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) were analyzed. Results Two‐way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between sex, cognitive performance, and statin use in which female statin users scored significantly lower on multiple subdomains of the BNA‐R (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Patients taking atorvastatin additionally scored lower on CERAD delayed recall, delayed recognition, and in the cumulative recognition domain than other groups (p < 0.05). Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were additionally associated with higher frequency of dysphoria and disinhibition, respectively (p < 0.05). No significant results were found in other measures investigated. Conclusions In addition to minor associations between atorvastatin usage and lower memory performance, findings from this investigation suggest a possible interaction between sex, cognition and statin use that has not been well documented in literature. Though these findings were not reflected in other measures such as subjective complaint or function, further research may be warranted to provide insight into the relationship between sex, statin usage and neurological effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→