MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4206205594 · doi:10.1101/2022.01.07.22268836

Genome-wide Association Study of Pulmonary Function in Europeans and Africans from the UK Biobank Identifies Distinct Variants

2022· preprint· en· W4206205594 on OpenAlexaff
Musalula Sinkala, Samar S. M. Elsheikh, Mamana Mbiyavanga, Joshua Cullinan, Nicola Mulder

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCommon FundNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiobankGenome-wide association studyGeneticsPhenotypePulmonary function testingBiologyGenetic associationMedicineGenotypeGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pulmonary function is an indicator of well-being, and pulmonary pathologies are the third major cause of death worldwide. FEV1, FVC, and PEF are quantitively used to assess pulmonary function. We conducted a genome-wide association analysis of pulmonary function in 383,471 individuals of European and 5,978 African descent represented in the UK Biobank. Here, we report 817 variants in Europeans and 3 in Africans associated (p-values < 5 × 10 −8 ) with three pulmonary function parameters; FEV1, FVC and PEF. In addition to 377 variants in Europeans previously reported to be associated with phenotypes related to pulmonary function, we identified 330 novel loci, including an ISX intergenic variant rs369476290 on chromosome 22 in Africans and a KDM2A intron variant rs12790261 on chromosome 11 in Europeans. Remarkably, we find no shared variants among Africans and Europeans. Enrichment analyses of variants separately for each ancestry background revealed significant enrichment for terms related to pulmonary phenotypes in Europeans but not Africans. Further analysis of studies of pulmonary phenotypes revealed individuals of European background are disproportionally overrepresented in datasets compared to Africans, with the gap widening over the past five years. Our findings offer a better understanding of the different variants that modify pulmonary function in Africans and Europeans, a significant finding for future GWAS studies and medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→