Regional Crop Characterization Using Multi-Temporal Optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar Earth Observations Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crop biophysical parameters, such as Leaf Area Index (LAI) and biomass, are essential for estimating crop productivity, yield modeling, and agronomic management. This study used several features extracted from multi-temporal Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and spectral vegetation indices extracted from Sentinel-2 optical data to estimate crop LAI and wet and dry biomass. Various machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest Regression (RFR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), were trained and assessed for three major crops (wheat, soybeans and canola). ANN provided the best accuracy for all wheat parameters and soybean LAI and canola wet biomass and LAI. RFR led to higher accuracy for soybean dry and wet biomass. However, SVR could accurately estimate only canola dry biomass. All data were then pooled to investigate if a single algorithm could estimate biophysical parameters for all crops. The RFR model accurately estimated wet and dry biomass and LAI across all crop types in this scenario. This generic model is fast and accurate and can be easily applied for crop mapping and monitoring over large geographies using cloud computing platforms, such as Google Earth Engine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".