MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206218082 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2020.11.0031

Transcriptome Profiling of Lisianthus (<i>Eustoma grandiflorum</i>) under Drought Stress

2020· article· en· W4206218082 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xia An, Qiang Zhu, Xuping Lou, Lufeng Li, Jie Chen, Tingting Liu, Wenlue Li, Xiahong Luo, Guanlin Zhu, Lijun Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTranscriptomeGeneGeneticsBotanyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lisianthus ( Eustoma grandiflorum ) is an important ornamental plant native to North America. So far, the number of basic molecular research reports on Lisianthus is relatively small, especially the research related to the molecular mechanism of response to drought stress. In this experiment, transcriptome second-generation sequencing technology was used to study Lisianthus seedlings under drought stress. The results showed that the transcriptome sequencing data had good quality control results. In order to obtain genetic information on this basis, the sequences were spliced using software such as Trinity and Corset, a total of 102,014 non-redundant genes were obtained, including 2,929 coding genes which were found to belong to 79 transcription factor families after analyzing. Annotating all genes, Zhongguo coffee was found to be the species with the highest comparison similarity. Finally, simple sequence repeat (SSR) analysis was performed on the gene sequences, and all SSR information contained in non-redundant genes and transcription factor coding genes had been obtained. The results of this study can provide candidate molecular resources for subsequent studies on Lisianthus 's response to drought stress in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207