Role of tau protein on the photophysical properties of fluorescent carbon dots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Globally, a number of individuals who live with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), an incurable and debilitating disease, is increasing. Tau protein has a structural role, maintains integrity of microtubules and is one of the underlying causes of the tauopathies [1]. It is unfolded and highly soluble under physiological conditions. However, tau protein undergoes post‐translational modifications like phosphorylation and aggregates causing cell death and spreading. In vitro, tau aggregation is typically evaluated using spectroscopic and microscopic methods. Methods Herein, we propose to evaluate the use of carbon dots, an important type of fluorescent nanoparticles, as potential probes for tau protein aggregation. Dual fluorescent carbon dots were used in combination with tau protein, prior and post aggregation. Aggregation of the longest isoform of tau441 was induced using heparin. The fluorescence spectroscopy was used to analyze photophysical properties of carbon dots as a function of monomeric and aggregated tau. Results The fluorescence quenching was observed for all protein containing samples, and was dependent on the aging time used for aggregation. The performance of carbon dots was compared to the standard Thioflavin T assay. Conclusion Data indicate that nanomaterials may be useful platforms for sensing application targeting biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases. References: [1] a. Andronesi, O. C., Bergen, M. V., Biernat, J., Seidel, K., Griesinger, C., Mandelkow, E., & Baldus, M. (2008). Characterization of Alzheimer’s‐like paired helical filaments from the core domain of tau protein using solid‐state NMR spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 130(18), 5922‐5928.; b. Jeganathan, S., Hascher, A., Chinnathambi, S., Biernat, J., Mandelkow, E. M., & Mandelkow, E. (2008). Proline‐directed pseudo‐phosphorylation at AT8 and PHF1 epitopes induces a compaction of the paperclip folding of Tau and generates a pathological (MC‐1) conformation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283(46), 32066‐32076.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".