MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combining a genetic algorithm and ensemble method to improve the classification of viruses

2021· article· en· W4206241450 on OpenAlexafffund
Dylan Lebatteux, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSupport vector machineComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Kernel (algebra)Feature vectorIdentification (biology)Artificial intelligenceGenomeSource codeAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningMathematicsBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genomic features identification is an important step toward machine learning (ML) derived classifiers. Designing robust feature identification methods can increase the performance of ML algorithms and reduce high dimensional data. The Classification of genomes from nucleotides sequences often requires an exponential feature space according to the size of the genomes. These feature spaces should also capture the abundant mutations affecting the genomic sequences over time of several complex viruses such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). One way of overcoming such challenges could be to design an accurate and efficient algorithm to capture a bag of minimal subsets of genomic features based on k-mers that could represent the most likely alternative and evolutionary space. In this article, we introduce KEVOLVE, a new method based on a Genetic Algorithm (GA) including a ML kernel to extract a bag of minimal subsets of genomic features maximizing a given classification score threshold. K EVOLVE is coupled with an ensemble prediction model based on support vector machines (SVMs) and is applied on the classification of HIV genomic sequences. Subsets of genomic features identified reduce the size of initial feature matrices by 99% and models based on them outperform state-of-the-art HIV predictors. The results also show that KEVOLVE is less sensitive to high mutation rates of the virus. The source code is available at https://github.com/bioinfoUQAM/Kevolve

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207