MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206288676 · doi:10.4992/pacjpa.84.0_pd-100

Educational level and its Association with the domains of Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test

2020· article· en· W4206288676 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kaori Tachi, Kana Inoue, Yuki Sakai, Saori Tanaka

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentTest (biology)CognitionPsychologyCognitive impairmentPsychiatryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) は軽度認知障害のスクリーニング検査であり,合計得点の算出時に教育年数を考慮する特徴がある。先行研究では,MoCAの下位指標の一つである言語領域得点において教育年数の影響が報告されているが,日本においてMoCAの各認知領域得点と教育年数との関連は明らかになっていない。そこで本研究では,教育年数がMoCAの各認知領域に与える影響を評価するため,60歳以上の健常高齢者104名に対し日本語版MoCAおよび教育年数の聴取を行い,教育年数で2群(低群:12年以下,37名;高群:13年以上,67名)に分け,各認知領域得点についてWelch’s t-testを行った。その結果,先行研究で報告されている言語領域得点(t(76.0)=-2.114, p=0.038)に加え,注意領域得点(t(62.8)=-2.075, p=0.042)においても,教育年数高群の方が低群よりも有意に高かった。以上より,日本では教育年数がMoCAの言語領域だけでなく注意領域にも影響を与えることが示唆された。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological AssociationSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207