MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206296580 · doi:10.1002/0470857269.ch17

Kinetic Studies of the Reactions of SiC and SiSi Bonds

2001· other· en· W4206296580 on OpenAlexaff
Tracy L. Morkin, Thomas R. Owens, William J. Leigh

Bibliographic record

VenuePatai's chemistry of functional groups · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryReactivity (psychology)PhotochemistrySileneSubstituentKineticsAddition reactionNucleophileCycloadditionSolventOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryNucleophilic additionCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Experimental Methods Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Reactions of Silenes Unimolecular Reactions Bimolecular Reactions General Trends Dimerization Nucleophilic Addition Addition of Water and Alcohols Addition of Acetic Acid Addition of Aliphatic Amines Addition of Alkoxysilanes Ene- and [2+2]-addition of Ketones, Aldehydes and Esters Ene-, [2+2]- and [4+2]-cycloaddition of Alkenes and Dienes Other Reactions—Oxygen, Sulphoxides and Halocarbons Solvent Effects on Silene Reactivity Substituent Effects on Silene Reactivity Silenes of the Type (R)MeSiCH2 and Me2SiCHR 1-silaallenes Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Reactions of Disilenes Unimolecular Reactions Bimolecular Reactions Addition of Alcohols and Phenols [2+4]-, [2+2]- and [2+1]-cycloadditions of Dienes, Carbonyl Compounds and Oxygen Conclusions Appendix: Negative Arrhenius Activation Energies References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePatai's chemistry of functional groupsSame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207