MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206300652 · doi:10.33395/owner.v6i1.554

Pengembangan Metode Pemulihan Penerimaan Pajak Pasca Pandemi Covid-19

2022· article· en· W4206300652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mokhtar Sayyid, Rita Nataliawati

Bibliographic record

VenueOwner · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenueCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Tax revenueBusinessQuarter (Canadian coin)IncentiveEconomicsAccountingPublic economicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The case of the Covid-19 pandemic caused a slowdown in economic growth in Indonesia, which in turn resulted in a decrease in the amount of tax revenue, which eventually led the government to provide tax incentives to taxpayers. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a tremendous impact on all countries in the world, including Indonesia. The Central Statistics Agency (BPS) announced that the Indonesian economy experienced a slowdown in the first quarter of 2020, which was 2.97%. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2019, Indonesia's economic growth was recorded at minus 2.41%. This study aims to develop a method of tax revenue that has been adapted to the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic. This study uses an exploratory method with a quantitative approach. The data used are the annual reports of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2018 and 2019. The sample selection method uses a purposive sampling method and obtained 233 samples for 2018 and 227 samples for 2019. With the results in the form of suggestions given in improving Post-covid-19 tax revenues, namely (1) Optimization of the withholding tax (WHT) mechanism, (2) Imposition of Final PPh for non-SME taxpayers, and (3) Efficiency of tax collection costs. This proposal requires in-depth study before implementation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOwnerSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207