Cultural and educational work of the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute for preserving the national identity in the second half of the XX century (on materials of Ukrainian-language periodicals of the US diaspora)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article shows the activity of one of the leading Ukrainian scientific institutions in the diaspora, in particular the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, in the sphere of preserving the national identity. The main source base of the study was Ukrainian-language publications of the Ukrainian diaspora in the United States. The main directions of cultural and educational activity of this institution are described i.e. activity of Harvard Ukrainian Summer Institute, opening of three departments of Ukrainian studies in this prestigious university, scientific researches, publications presenting results of Ukrainian scientists and the ones about Ukraine, increase of library funds of Ukrainian, scientific conferences, book exhibitions, art exhibitions, cultural and entertainment events. The interaction of scientists from the USA and Canada in the field of Ukrainian studies, which resulted in the creation of the Standing Conference of Ukrainian Studies, is presented. The main topics of Harvard Ukrainian Studies in the study period are considered. The focus is on the first publications on the Holodomor, which were made at the Harvard Institute. The activities of the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute are useful as it brings the light to the Ukrainian problem or segment of a particular topic from the Ukrainians’ point of view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".