MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206360774 · doi:10.1109/mcom.009.2100389

ATMoS+: Generalizable Threat Mitigation in SDN Using Permutation Equivariant and Invariant Deep Reinforcement Learning

2021· article· en· W4206360774 on OpenAlexaff
Hauton Tsang, Iman Akbari, Mohammad A. Salahuddin, Noura Limam, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningScalabilityInvariant (physics)Distributed computingEquivariant mapSoftware-defined networkingSet (abstract data type)SoftwareNetwork architecturePermutation (music)Artificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software-defined networking creates new opportunities for automated network security management by providing a global network view and a standard interface for configuring network policies. Previously, we proposed a general framework, called ATMoS, for autonomous threat mitigation using reinforcement learning (RL) in software-defined networks. Using a suitable set of host simulations and based on observations from an arbitrary network monitoring infrastructure, ATMoS can autonomously mitigate threats by moving hosts between a set of virtual networks that embody different network policies. In this article, we propose ATMoS+, which extends the RL agent in ATMoS with a novel Deep Q-Network architecture. The deep RL agent in ATMoS+ leverages permutation-invariant and permutation-equivariant set functions to relax previous assumptions on the number of network hosts and their ordering. We showcase that the proposed deep RL agent is scalable and generalizes to an arbitrary-sized network without additional retraining, scales with the number of hosts, and accommodates several different types of threat alerts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207