HLocalExp-CM: confidence map by hierarchical local expansion moves for accurate stereo matching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a stereo matching approach referred to as HLocalExp-CM by exploiting the hierarchical local contextual information and a confidence map based on a new grid structure. The proposed approach preserves fine depth edges and extracts accurate disparities in weak texture, textureless, and repeated texture regions. The proposed approach adopts a two-stage optimization strategy. In the framework of first stage, a multiresolution cost aggregation is minimized to reduce the search space of the disparity plane of each pixel. The second stage iteratively optimizes the confidence map and a global energy function to progressively improve the disparity accuracy for each pixel. The confidence map is estimated through classifying the pixels into distinctive and ambiguous ones by computing the decreasing rate of the multiresolution cost aggregation and then performs a spatial propagation and plane refinement for the update of the disparity of each pixel, thereby successfully eliminating the ambiguity of nondistinctive pixels. The global energy function based on a pairwise Markov random field uses cross-scale cost aggregation for taking advantage of context information of objects in different scenarios on local grid regions, which is different from the deep learning technique uses convolution layers extracting the context information. The proposed approach is evaluated on Middlebury benchmark V3, and is ranked first based on “bad 2.0 all metric,” a widely used criterion for the evaluation of stereo images, while the eighth place on “bad 2.0 nonocc metric” (recorded on July 24, 2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".