MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206372323 · doi:10.1117/1.jei.31.1.013003

HLocalExp-CM: confidence map by hierarchical local expansion moves for accurate stereo matching

2022· article· en· W4206372323 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronic Imaging · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePixelComputer scienceMatching (statistics)Context (archaeology)Metric (unit)GridMarkov random fieldBenchmark (surveying)Pairwise comparisonPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionMathematicsImage segmentationSegmentationGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a stereo matching approach referred to as HLocalExp-CM by exploiting the hierarchical local contextual information and a confidence map based on a new grid structure. The proposed approach preserves fine depth edges and extracts accurate disparities in weak texture, textureless, and repeated texture regions. The proposed approach adopts a two-stage optimization strategy. In the framework of first stage, a multiresolution cost aggregation is minimized to reduce the search space of the disparity plane of each pixel. The second stage iteratively optimizes the confidence map and a global energy function to progressively improve the disparity accuracy for each pixel. The confidence map is estimated through classifying the pixels into distinctive and ambiguous ones by computing the decreasing rate of the multiresolution cost aggregation and then performs a spatial propagation and plane refinement for the update of the disparity of each pixel, thereby successfully eliminating the ambiguity of nondistinctive pixels. The global energy function based on a pairwise Markov random field uses cross-scale cost aggregation for taking advantage of context information of objects in different scenarios on local grid regions, which is different from the deep learning technique uses convolution layers extracting the context information. The proposed approach is evaluated on Middlebury benchmark V3, and is ranked first based on “bad 2.0 all metric,” a widely used criterion for the evaluation of stereo images, while the eighth place on “bad 2.0 nonocc metric” (recorded on July 24, 2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it