Coastal planktonic community unaffected by Boreal hydropower complex in Québec, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comprehensive studies of the impact of hydropower on coastal environments are rare. This study examines the impact of commissioning the hydropower plants of the Romaine complex on the freshwater discharge of the Rivière Romaine near its estuary and on the Chenal de Mingan ecosystem in the summers of 2015, 2017 and 2019. Continuous temperature, salinity and chlorophyll a data were obtained from two instrumented buoys, and nutrients as well as the phytoplankton and zooplankton communities were sampled five times a year at 11 stations. The results demonstrate the major influence of offshore waters on temperature and salinity in the study area, and the decreasing influence of the Rivière Romaine with distance from its mouth. Nutrient concentrations in the estuary did not covary with river discharge or with nutrient concentrations in the river. Importantly, impoundment of the reservoirs of the complex had no measurable effect on nutrient stoichiometry in the Chenal de Mingan. Overall, the chlorophyll a concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 7.6 µg L −1 in the channel, the community was dominated by diatoms, and phytoplankton growth was either nitrate limited or under predation pressure. The zooplankton community has been composed of the same groups of species and has been dominated by cyclopoids and calanoids since 2015. Our study underlines the importance of including regional meteorological trends in the analysis to avoid biased conclusions on the impact of hydropower projects. The study concluded that modulation of the Rivière Romaine discharge and related changes in water quality did not lead to measurable change in plankton production in the Chenal de Mingan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".