MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206419720 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023511

Simons Observatory: Constraining inflationary gravitational waves with multitracer <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math>-mode delensing

2022· article· en· W4206419720 on OpenAlexafffund
Toshiya Namikawa, Antón Baleato Lizancos, Naomi Robertson, Blake D. Sherwin, A. Challinor, David Alonso, S. Azzoni, C. Baccigalupi, Erminia Calabrese, Julien Carron, Y. Chinone, Jens Chluba, Gabriele Coppi, Josquin Errard, Giulio Fabbian, Simone Ferraro, Alba Kalaja, Antony Lewis, Mathew S. Madhavacheril, P. Daniel Meerburg, Joel Meyers, F. Nati, Giorgio Orlando, D. Poletti, Giuseppe Puglisi, M. Remazeilles, Neelima Sehgal, O. Tajima, Grant Teply, Alexander van Engelen, Edward J. Wollack, Zhilei Xu, Byeonghee Yu, Ningfeng Zhu, A. Zonca

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekIsaac Newton TrustH2020 European Research CouncilIndustry CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaNational Science FoundationRoyal SocietyH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungEuropean Research CouncilGordon and Betty Moore FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversity of CambridgeMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundGravitational lensPlanckGravitational waveAstrophysicsObservatoryGalaxySkyTelescopeEinstein TelescopeWeak gravitational lensingAstronomyOpticsAnisotropyRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce and validate a delensing framework for the Simons Observatory (SO), which will be used to improve constraints on inflationary gravitational waves by reducing the lensing noise in measurements of the $B$ modes in CMB polarization. SO will initially observe CMB by using three small aperture telescopes and one large-aperture telescope. While polarization maps from small-aperture telescopes will be used to constrain inflationary gravitational waves, the internal CMB lensing maps used to delens will be reconstructed from data from the large-aperture telescope. Since lensing maps obtained from the SO data will be noise dominated on subdegree scales, the SO lensing framework constructs a template for lensing-induced $B$ modes by combining internal CMB lensing maps with maps of the cosmic infrared background from Planck as well as galaxy density maps from the LSST survey. We construct a likelihood for constraining the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ that contains auto and cross spectra between observed $B$ modes and the lensing $B$-mode template. We test our delensing analysis pipeline on map-based simulations containing survey nonidealities, but that, for this initial exploration, does not include contamination from Galactic and extragalactic foregrounds. We find that the SO survey masking and inhomogeneous and atmospheric noise have very little impact on the delensing performance, and the $r$ constraint becomes $\ensuremath{\sigma}(r)\ensuremath{\approx}0.0015$ which is close to that obtained from the idealized forecasts in the absence of the Galactic foreground and is nearly a factor of 2 tighter than without delensing. We also find that uncertainties in the external large-scale structure tracers used in our multitracer delensing pipeline lead to bias much smaller than the $1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ statistical uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207