MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

GBM AGILE: A global, phase 2/3 adaptive platform trial to evaluate multiple regimens in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.

2021· article· en· W4206450867 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Y. Wen, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Meredith Buxton, Webster K. Cavenee, Howard Colman, John Frederick De Groot, Benjamin M. Ellingson, Gary Gordon, Mustafa Khasraw, Andrew B. Lassman, Michael Lim, James Perry, Kirk Tanner, Michael Weller, W.K. Alfred Yung, Timothy F. Cloughesy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialRandomizationGlioblastomaAgile software developmentDosingOncologyInternal medicineMedical physicsComputer scienceCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS2074 Background: GBM AGILE, Glioblastoma Adaptive, Global, Innovative Learning Environment, is an international, multi-arm, seamless phase 2/3 response adaptive randomization platform trial designed to evaluate multiple therapies in newly diagnosed (ND) and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with the goal of identifying effective therapies matching them accurately to different patient subtypes in an accelerated manner. It is a collaboration between academic investigators, patient organizations and industry to support new drug applications for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Methods: The primary objective of GBM AGILE is to identify therapies that effectively improve overall survival in patients with ND or recurrent GBM. Bayesian response adaptive randomization is used within subtypes of the disease to assign participants to investigational arms based on their performance. Operating under a Master Protocol, GBM AGILE allows multiple drugs from different pharmaceutical companies to be evaluated simultaneously and/or over time against a common standard of care control. Based on performance, a drug may graduate and move to a rapid stage 2 (phase 3) within the trial, and the totality of the data can be used for a new drug application. An active pipeline is critical to the ongoing success of GBM AGILE. With the leadership of the trial’s Arm Selection Committee, uniform processes for including new drugs have been established to ensure a consistent review of drugs/drug combinations over the course of the trial. Factors considered include relevant pre-clinical data, preliminary evidence for antitumor activity. pharmacokinetic data to support proposed drug dosing and administration, and potential biomarkers helpful for the development of a drug. GBM AGILE provides an efficient mechanism to screen and develop robust information regarding the efficacy of proposed novel therapeutics and associated biomarkers for GBM and to quickly move therapies and biomarkers into clinic. GBM AGILE received IND approval from the FDA in April 2019, screening its first patient in June 2019. Site activation is ongoing in the US, with over 35 active sites and over 425 patients screened (as of February 2021). Expansion to Canada, Europe and China are under progress. Clinical trial information: NCT03970447.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→