Isolated Cranial Nerve VI Palsy and Neurosyphilis: A Case Report and Review of Related Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An isolated cranial nerve VI palsy is a rare initial manifestation of undiagnosed neurosyphilis. A 33-year-old male presented with a one month history of progressive headache and diplopia. Neurologic examination only revealed an isolated abducens palsy on the left. Cranial imaging was unremarkable. Examination of his cerebrospinal fluid revealed lymphocytic predominant leukocytosis and elevated protein. Microbiologic work-up were all negative. Further work-up revealed the patient to be serum Rapid Plasma Reagin and Enzyme Immunoassay reactive. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Human Immunodeficiency Virus also tested positive. His cerebrospinal fluid was then sent for Rapid Plasma Reagin to confirm the diagnosis of neurosyphilis. He completed 14 days of intravenous penicillin and was eventually discharged with partial resolution of the abducens palsy. We describe the second case of neurosyphilis presenting only with an isolated cranial nerve VI involvement. On further review, ours was the first case documented on an individual who had an undiagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection. There are various differentials for an isolated cranial neuritis but infectious causes, particularly neurosyphilis, should be considered among young individuals with known risk factors despite their apparently benign medical history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".