Ring chromosome 22 and autism: Report and review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ring chromosome 22 has been described in over 50 cases. A characteristic phenotype has not been fully delineated; however, long face, thick eyebrows, 2–3 toe syndactyly, mental retardation, adequate somatic growth and the absence of major malformations are noted in many cases. An 11-year-old boy with ring chromosome 22 and 46,XY,r(22)(p11.31-q13.31∼q13.33) karyotype presented with global developmental delay, autistic disorder, and dolichocephaly, apparently low-set and large ears, midface hypoplasia, and 2–3 toe syndactyly. This is the second report of a ring chromosome 22 with autistic disorder. There appears to be an association between abnormalities of chromosome 22, including r(22), and autistic disorder; however, this occurrence may be a result of the association of autistic disorder with mental retardation rather than specifically due to r(22). The physical findings in this case also suggest that ring chromosome 22 causes a subtle but distinct phenotype which has previously been proposed. Am. J. Med. Genet. 90:382–385, 2000 © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".