From the chair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to the new academic year! I hope you had an enjoyable summer. Please join me in congratulating the members of the ACM-SIGMIS CPR (Computer Personnel Research) 2007 Conference Committee for organizing a successful conference. This year's conference was held at the Hyatt Regency in St. Louis, Missouri, USA from April 19 - 21, 2007, http://www.sigmis.org/conferences.html. The SIGMIS CPR 2007 Conference Proceedings are available in the ACM Digital Library at: http://portal.acm.org/dl.cfm. I would like to thank the members of the 2007 Conference Committee for all their hard work in making this conference a success: Conference Co-Chairs: Fred Niederman, St. Louis University Mary Sumner, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Program Co-Chairs: Diane Lending, James Madison University Chelley Vician, Michigan Tech University Local Arrangements: Jo Ellen Moore, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Susan Yager, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Treasurer: Donald Amoroso, Appalachian State University Publicity: Anne Powell, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Sandra Newton, University of South Florida . The recipients of the fourth annual Magid Igbaria Outstanding Conference Paper of the Year Award are Tim Klaus of Texas A&M University, Stephen Wingreen of Southeastern University, and J. Ellis Blanton of University of South Florida for their paper, "Examining User Resistance and Management Strategies in Enterprise Systems Implementations." Congratulations to all of you!. Please consider submitting your research to next year's CPR 2008. The submission deadline is October 15, 2007. Everyone is welcome! For information about next year's CPR 2008 Conference, please check our website at: http://www.acm.org/sigmis. Also, please continue to consider Data Base as an outlet for your research. The new online submission system is available at the Data Base website at: http://the-database.org. Finally, please mark your calendar now for the Seventh Annual ACM-SIGMIS Reception: Where: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2007) Fairmont The Queen Elizabeth Hotel, Montreal, Canada When: 5:30 to 7:00 pm -- Saturday, December 8, 2007 Who: All ACM-SIGMIS members and their invited guests are welcome! . We appreciate your continued support of SIGMIS. We welcome any ideas or suggestions to improve SIGMIS. Please feel free to contact any one of us.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".