MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fuel Resources

2000· other· en· W4206579564 on OpenAlexaffabout
David A. Tillman, Jeffrey B. Warshauer, D.E. Prinzing

Bibliographic record

VenueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalNatural gasEnvironmental scienceWaste managementFossil fuelRenewable energyEnergy sourcePetroleumBiomass (ecology)Renewable fuelsAlternative energyEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Coal production is most significant fuel source followed by natural gas and petroleum. Coal is overwhelmingly the most significant energy source used to generate electricity. Increased emphasis had been placed on renewable energy resources, including wood and wood waste; municipal solid waste and refuse‐derived fuel; other sources of biomass and waste, eg, agricultural crop wastes, tire‐derived fuels, and selected hazardous wastes burned as fuel substitutes in cement kilns; wind and solar energy; geothermal steam and hot water; and other unconventional energy sources. Estimates of the contribution of these energy sources vary. There are vast reserves of coal and lignite in the United States. Environmental considerations were reflected in coal production and consumption statistics, including regional production patterns and economic sector utilization characteristics. Average coal sulfur content and coal ash content declined, clearly reflecting a trend toward utilization of coal that produces less SO 2 and less flyash to capture. U.S. resources and reserves of petroleum and natural gas, including natural gas liquids (NGL), are limited. The United States has experienced a significant decline in oil reserves. Similarly, there was a net reserve loss of dry natural gas. The decrease in petroleum and natural gas reserves has encouraged interest in and discovery and development of unconventional sources of these hydrocarbons. Domestic petroleum, natural gas, and natural gas liquids production has declined at a rate commensurate with the decrease in reserves. Total U.S. oil and gas consumption remains high, and these are the fuels of choice for residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation applications. Nuclear, hydroelectric, and geothermal resources now contribute some 9.8 EJ annually to the U.S. economy. Biomass and waste fuels contributed some 3.7 EJ to the economy. These fuels include wood and wood waste; spent pulping liquor at pulp and paper mills; agricultural materials such as rice hulls, bagasse, cotton gin trash, coffee grounds, and a variety of manures. Other sources of energy worth noting are the extensive wind farms, solar projects, and related emerging unconventional technologies. Attention is being paid to increasing the efficiency of fuel utilization as well as to reducing the formation of airborne emissions ranging form particulates NO x and SO 2 to the management of air toxics such as HCl and trace metals. The overwhelming sources of petroleum reserves and supply are in the Middle East. Other significant sources of reserves include Russia, the North Sea, North American countries, and parts of southeast Asia. There are also significant concentrations of coal reserves in Russia and China. The United States, Poland, South Africa, Australia, India, Germany, and the United Kingdom also produce coal. Canada obtains some of its energy from the Athabasca tar sands development. Renewable and unconventional energy sources are used more extensively in other parts of the world than in the United States. Biofuels are a significant contributor to certain economies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical TechnologySame topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207