Some new Jensen, Schur and Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for log convex fuzzy interval-valued functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<abstract> <p>The inclusion relation and the order relation are two distinct ideas in interval analysis. Convexity and nonconvexity create a significant link with different sorts of inequalities under the inclusion relation. For many classes of convex and nonconvex functions, many works have been devoted to constructing and refining classical inequalities. However, it is generally known that log-convex functions play a significant role in convex theory since they allow us to deduce more precise inequalities than convex functions. Because the idea of log convexity is so important, we used fuzzy order relation $\left(\preceq \right)$ to establish various discrete Jensen and Schur, and Hermite-Hadamard (H-H) integral inequality for log convex fuzzy interval-valued functions (L-convex F-I-V-Fs). Some nontrivial instances are also offered to bolster our findings. Furthermore, we show that our conclusions include as special instances some of the well-known inequalities for L-convex F-I-V-Fs and their variant forms. Furthermore, we show that our conclusions include as special instances some of the well-known inequalities for L-convex F-I-V-Fs and their variant forms. These results and different approaches may open new directions for fuzzy optimization problems, modeling, and interval-valued functions.</p> </abstract>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it