MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206776630 · doi:10.1353/ppp.2021.0046

Louis Charland: 1958–2021

2021· article· nl· W4206776630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Zachar, Jennifer Radden

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophy, psychiatry & psychology · 2021
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)ExcellenceDiplomacyHistorySociologyMedia studiesArt historyLawPolitical sciencePoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Louis Charland:1958–2021 Peter Zachar and Jennifer Radden A professor of philosophy at Western University in Ontario, with joint appointments in Philosophy and the School of Health Studies, Louis Charland unexpectedly passed away on May 9, 2021. In addition to Western, he taught at the Universities of Toronto, McGill, and Concordia. He had visiting appointments at Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotion in Perth, and the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin. Beyond his teaching and research, he also undertook consulting work for several hospitals and governmental and social service agencies. Louis was the son of a diplomat and was raised as a citizen of the world, with Paris in particular being his psychological hometown. When in Canada as a child, he often resided in Montreal where his grandparents lived and he learned to shift between either a Parisian accent or a Québécois accent, depending on the person with whom he was conversing. A vivid personage, Louis dressed in elegant scarves and distinctive hats right out of a Toulouse-Lautrec lithograph, with a matching cosmopolitan air and refined European sensibilities. An artist at heart, Louis was a chef, a poet, and—before chronic dystonia robbed him of the use of one hand—an accomplished classical guitar player. He was a warm and courteous person who maintained his many connections with attentive ness and flair. Perhaps reflecting both his parents' lives in the world of diplomacy, Louis had a genial and conciliatory personality, sometimes ruffled in his dress, but always unruffled by disagreement. Charland's philosophical work can be loosely divided up into four research areas: Bioethics and more specifically decision-making capacity related to informed consent, particularly as applied to addiction, anorexia, and depression; The Philosophy of Affect, in every aspect, including the history of emotion and the concept of the passions; the History of Psychiatry, especially eighteenth- and nineteenth-century thinkers such as Pinel, Crichton, Esquirol, and Ribot, and the Philosophy of Psychiatry, including the history of moral treatment and a critique of overmedicalization. Much of his work pertaining to psychiatry involved the concept of the passions. As opposed to more transient emotional states, passions represent long-term states that can become organizing principles in behavior. Similar to the intellectualist notion of fixed ideas (except that the affective dimension is emphasized), he recognized that passions can involve a loss of control and become maladaptive. In recent research, Charland argued that anorexia nervosa is best conceptualized and treated as a passion. Proposed in collaboration with three psychiatrist colleagues, "the passion theory of anorexia" offered an alternative to traditional cognitive behavioral approaches and [End Page 295] engendered a debate among clinicians who specialize in the treatment of eating disorders. Charland's interest in and knowledge of the history of French psychiatry, with emphasis on such figures as Pinel, and English Quaker practices of moral treatment, served to expand North American understanding of non-German traditions. [End Page 296] Copyright © 2021 Johns Hopkins University Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophy, psychiatry & psychologySame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207