Exposure Determinants in the French Database COLCHIC (1987–2019): Statistical Modeling across 77 Chemicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The COLCHIC database contains workplace exposure results of chemical samples collected by the French prevention network since 1987. We aimed to investigate potential associations between exposure levels and ancillary variables in COLCHIC across a broad range of chemical agents in order to provide insight into how to best interpret and exploit the information in this national database. METHODS: We selected personal and area measurements in COLCHIC and collected outside respiratory personal protective equipment (PPE), restricted to chemical agents that had at least 1000 samples available. We used Tobit models to estimate associations between exposure concentrations and sample year, sampling duration, PPE, workforce size, collective protective equipment, origin of request, and reason for request for each chemical agent for the period 1987-2019. Models for period 2002-2019 also included type of process (open/closed) and exposure frequency. We used separate models for each combination of agent, period, and personal or area samples. We then applied Bayesian meta-analytical methods to assess average effects and effect heterogeneity of exposure factors across agents. RESULTS: COLCHIC contained 720 282 exposure results (62% personal and 38% area samples) to 77 agents, including 346 766 results for the more recent period 2002-2019 (67% personal and 33% area samples). Sample year and duration, PPE, and process type had the strongest and most consistent associations with exposure levels across agents. Personal and area exposure levels decreased yearly (6% for the entire period and 9% since 2002), and 30-min samples were approximately twice as high as 240-min samples. Workers wearing PPE were exposed to levels 1.7 times higher on average than those without PPE for both area and personal samples. Personal exposure levels associated with enclosed or semi-enclosed processes were approximately 20-30% lower compared with open processes. The associations for the other exposure variables were weaker and more inconsistent between agents. Between-agent heterogeneity of estimated effects, based on 80% prediction intervals, was lowest for sampling duration, time trends, and the presence of PPE. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling duration, time trends, and the presence of PPE are important factors to take into account when analyzing COLCHIC and had similar associations with exposure levels across agents. Other variables generally showed weaker associations or variable effects. These results will be used to adjust exposure estimates for the French working population from measurements stored in COLCHIC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".