MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4206790538 · doi:10.4103/tmj.tmj_217_20

Minor ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in young adults

2021· article· en· W4206790538 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Z. Elramady, KhaledH Rashed, Rania E.E. Mohamed, Hasan G.E. Nassar

Bibliographic record

VenueTanta Medical Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIschemic strokeMinor strokeTransient (computer programming)CardiologyMedicineStroke (engine)Minor (academic)Internal medicineIschemiaComputer scienceEngineeringHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Minor stroke and transient ischemic attack are markers of reduced cerebral blood flow; they rarely occur in the young but may have a long-lasting impact and also lifelong cognitive impairment. Aim The objective of our work was to estimate the possible etiologies and early functional and disability outcome in young adults. Patients and methods This study was carried out on 52 patients aged from 18 to 50 years submitted to history taking, general medical examination, neurological evaluation, cardiologic assessment including (ECG, transthoracic echo, and transesophageal echo if needed), laboratory investigation, and radiological imaging including [computed tomography (CT) brain, MRI brain with diffusion, carotid duplex, transcranial duplex (TCD), and/or CT angiography when needed]. Modified Rankin scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale were done at admission and 3 months after onset to assess physical dependence and cognitive impairment. Results The main risk factors for the development of minor stroke and transient ischemic attack were smoking (40.38%), hypertension (38.46%), diabetes mellitus (25%), cardiac disease (25%), and addiction (11.54%). The leading causes were small-artery disease (26.92%) and cardioembolic subtype (25%). The radiological finding of acute ischemic lesion was more common on diffusion-weighed imaging MRI than CT. Conclusions Smoking and hypertension were the most common risk factors. The most common causes are small-artery and cardioembolic diseases. Cognitive functions showed improvement within 3 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTanta Medical Journal→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→