MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206804039 · doi:10.1115/jrc2020-8059

Estimating the Inner Ring Defect Size and Residual Service Life of Freight Railcar Bearings Using Vibration Signatures

2020· article· en· W4206804039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Lima, Constantine Tarawneh, Jesse Aguilera, Jonas Cuanang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)SpallCondition monitoringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringVibrationResidualSchedulePreventive maintenanceComputer scienceReliability engineeringStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There are currently two primary wayside detection systems for monitoring the health of freight railcar bearings in the railroad industry: The Trackside Acoustic Detection System (TADS™) and the wayside Hot-Box Detector (HBD). TADS™ uses wayside microphones to detect and alert the train operator of high-risk defects. However, many defective bearings may never be detected by TADS™ since a high-risk defect is a spall which spans about 90% of a bearing’s raceway, and there are less than 30 systems in operation throughout the United States and Canada. HBDs sit on the side of the rail-tracks and use non-contact infrared sensors to acquire temperatures of bearings as they roll over the detector. These wayside bearing detection systems are reactive in nature and often require emergency stops in order to replace the wheelset containing the identified defective bearing. Train stoppages are inefficient and can be very costly. Unnecessary train stoppages can be avoided if a proper maintenance schedule can be developed at the onset of a defect initiating within the bearing. Using a proactive approach, railcars with defective bearings could be allowed to remain in service operation safely until reaching scheduled maintenance. The University Transportation Center for Railway Safety (UTCRS) research group at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV) has been working on developing a proactive bearing condition monitoring system which can reliably detect the onset of bearing failure. Unlike wayside detection systems, the onboard condition monitoring system can continuously assess the railcar bearing health and can provide accurate temperature and vibration profiles to alert of defect initiation. This system has been validated through rigorous laboratory testing at UTRGV and field testing at the Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) in Pueblo, CO. The work presented here builds on previously published work that demonstrates the use of the onboard condition monitoring system to identify defective bearings as well as the correlations developed for spall growth rates of defective bearing outer rings (cups). The system first uses the root-mean-square (RMS) value of the bearing’s acceleration to assess its health. Then, an analysis of the frequency domain of the acquired vibration signature determines if the bearing has a defective inner ring (cone) and the RMS value is used to estimate the defect size. This estimated size is then used to predict the residual life of the bearing. The methodology proposed in this paper can assist railroads and railcar owners in the development of a proactive and cost-efficient maintenance cycle for their rolling stock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRailway Engineering and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207