2196-P: HB-EGF Signaling Is Required for Glucose-Induced Pancreatic ß-Cell Proliferation in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Glucose is a major β-cell mitogen. Despite recent progress, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In a rat model of nutrient excess we previously showed that nutrient-induced β-cell proliferation is blocked when either EGF receptor (EGFR) or mTOR signaling is inhibited. Parallel transcriptomic analyses identified the EGFR ligand, HB-EGF as a potential mediator of nutrient-induced β-cell proliferation. Objective: To determine the role of HB-EGF in glucose-induced β-cell proliferation. Methods: HB-EGF mRNA levels were assessed by real-time PCR in isolated rat islets following a 24-h exposure to 2.8 or 16.7 mM glucose. The Carbohydrate-Responsive Element-Binding Protein (ChREBP) transcription factor was down-regulated by siRNA in dispersed rat islets. For β-cell proliferation studies islets were exposed to 16.7 mM glucose or HB-EGF (100 ng/ml) in the presence of 2.8 mM glucose for 72 h. Islets were co-cultured with the EGFR inhibitor AG1478 (300 nM) or the HB-EGF inhibitor CRM197 (10 ug/ml). shRNA was used to knockdown HB-EGF in isolated islets and either cultured ex vivo or transplanted under the kidney capsule of glucose-infused rats. β-cell proliferation was assessed by immunohistochemistry for Ki67 and insulin. Results: Glucose increased HB-EGF mRNA levels and this was prevented by ChREBP knockdown. HB-EGF potently stimulated β-cell proliferation. Inhibition of the EGFR or HB-EGF completely blocked not only the proliferative response to HB-EGF but also the response to 16.7 mM glucose. Knockdown of HB-EGF blocked the β-cell proliferative response to glucose in isolated rat islets as well as in transplanted islets. Conclusion: HB-EGF is a potent β-cell mitogen in rat islets. Glucose increases HB-EGF gene expression via ChREBP. The proliferative response to glucose requires an intact HB-EGF - EGFR pathway. Our findings identify a novel player in the complex mechanisms controlling β-cell proliferation in response to glucose. Disclosure H. Maachi: None. D. Scott: None. J. Ghislain: None. V. Poitout: None. Funding National Institutes of Health; Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".