Homozygous missense variant in <i>POPDC3</i> causes recessive limb‐girdle muscular dystrophy type 26
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases, affecting different muscles, predominantly skeletal muscles and cardiac muscles of the body. LGMD is classified into two main subtypes A and B, which are further subclassified into eight dominant and thirty recessive subtypes. Three genes, namely POPDC1, POPDC2 and POPDC3, encode popeye domain-containing protein (POPDC), and the variants of POPDC1 and POPDC3 genes have been associated with LGMD. METHODS: In the present study, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis on a single-family to investigate the hallmark features of LGMD. The results of WES were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing and 3D protein modeling was also conducted. RESULTS: WES data analysis and Sanger sequencing revealed a homozygous missense variant (c.460A>G; p.Lys154Glu) at a highly conserved amino acid position in the POPDC3. Mutations in the POPDC3 gene have been previously associated with recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 26. 3D protein modeling further suggested that the identified variant might affect the POPDC3 structure and proper function. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the role of POPDC3 in LGMD, and will facilitate genetic counseling of the family to mitigate the risks of the carrier or affects on future pregnancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".