Evolution of Prodromal Multiple System Atrophy from REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A Descriptive Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prodromal multiple system atrophy (MSA) has been characterized mainly by retrospective chart reviews. Direct observation and tracking of prodromal markers in MSA have been very limitedObjective:To report the baseline characteristics and evolution of prodromal markers of MSA as they were prospectively measured in patients with idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD)Methods:Patients with iRBD were evaluated as part of a comprehensive protocol repeated annually. The protocol included assessment of motor, sleep, psychiatric, and autonomic symptoms supplemented by motor examination, quantitative motor testing, neuropsychological examination, orthostatic blood pressure measurement, and tests of olfaction and color vision. Patients who eventually developed MSA were described and compared with those who phenoconverted to Lewy body disease (Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies). RESULTS: Of 67 phenocoverters, 4 developed MSA-P and 63 developed Lewy body disease. An additional 2 MSA-C patients were seen at baseline, already with cerebellar signs. Compared to those with Lewy body disease, those with MSA-P were younger, had less severe loss of tonic REM sleep atonia, more insomnia symptoms, and better olfaction. Clinically-evident autonomic dysfunction was not invariable in prodromal stages, often developing proximate to or after motor phenoconversion. Of the autonomic symptoms, genitourinary dysfunction was the first to develop in all cases. Olfaction and cognition remained normal throughout the prodromal and clinical disease course, in clear contrast to patients with Lewy body disease. CONCLUSION: Prodromal MSA progresses rapidly, often without substantial autonomic dysfunction, and with preserved olfaction and cognition throughout its prodromal course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".