MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206930772 · doi:10.1161/hyp.70.suppl_1.p509

Abstract P509: Identification of Radial Vascular Wall Abnormalities by Very-high Frequency Ultrasound in Patients With Fibromuscular Dysplasia: The Fuchsia Study

2017· article· en· W4206930772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosa María Bruno, Nicole Di Lascio, Daniela Guarino, Saverio Vitali, Piercarlo Rossi, Davide Caramella, Stefano Taddei, Lorenzo Ghiadoni, Francesco Faita

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEchogenicityMedicineAdventitiaUltrasoundFibromuscular dysplasiaLumen (anatomy)CardiologyNuclear medicineInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: This case-control study is aimed at identifying radial vascular wall abnormalities in patients with fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). Methods: High-frequency ultrasound scans of the radial arteries and of FMD patients and healthy controls were obtained by Vevo MD (70 MHz probe, FUJIFILM, VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada). Radial wall showed in all individuals two echogenic interfaces: the 1 st ( lumen-media) and the 2 nd (media-adventitia). Intima-media (IMT), adventitia (AT), and global thickness (IMAT) were measured and wall cross-sectional area (WCSA) calculated. The disarray level of the two echogenic interfaces was assessed calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) between 20 gray-level profiles crossing the two interfaces and the profile obtained averaging them. For each echogenic interface, the RMSE was normalized for the maximum value of the corresponding mean profile (RMSE/mean). Results: 11 treated hypertensive female FMD patients and 8 healthy control women (C) were enrolled (age 52±5 vs 45±13 years, p=0.51; BMI 26±3 vs 23±3, p=0.12; mean BP 97±7 vs 85±10, p=0.01). Radial internal diameter was similar (1.938±0.432 vs 1.701±0.532 mm, p=0.21). IMT (0.166±0.037 vs 0.128±0.022 mm, p=0.03), AT (0.114±0.029 vs 0.083±0.019 mm, p=0.008) and IMAT (0.281±0.042 vs 0.211±0.027 mm, p=0.003) were higher in FMD. Wall/lumen ratio was similar and WCSA increased in FMD, calculated with either IMT or IMAT. The maximum values of 1 st (121±43 vs 157±22, p=0.09) and 2 nd interface 109 ±44 vs133±18, p=0.09) tended to be lower, whereas RMSE/mean was higher in FMD (1 st 1.31±0.24 vs 0.83±0.32, p=0.006; 2 nd 1.37±0.38 vs 0.94±0.32, p=0.03). The difference was attenuated for the 1 st but not for the 2 nd interface when considering age and mean BP as covariates (p=0.054 and p=0.016 respectively). Conclusions: Wall ultrastructure of radial arteries of hypertensive FMD patients showed eutrophic remodeling. Furthermore, a peculiar “blurred” pattern occurred, characterized of loss of echogenicity and inhomogeneity of the two echogenic layers, independent of age and mean BP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicRenal and Vascular PathologiesFrench-language works237,207