Abstract P382: Management and Treatment of Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension: Results From a Survey of Patients and Caregivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To understand the patient and caregiver experience with the management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) Background: nOH is a sustained reduction in blood pressure (BP) with postural change associated with autonomic dysfunction. Clinical symptoms may include falls, leading to activity limits and a diminished sense of well-being. Methods: A US-based survey designed by the authors was conducted by Harris Poll. Eligible participants had Parkinson disease (PD), multiple system atrophy, or pure autonomic failure and ≥1 of the following: orthostatic hypotension (OH), nOH, low BP, OH/nOH symptoms, or were caregivers of eligible patients. Descriptive statistics are reported. Results: PD was the most frequent underlying diagnosis (Table 1) . Healthcare provider (HCP) communication with patients was rated as satisfactory by ≥75% of respondents, yet when nOH symptoms were first discussed with the HCP, only 35% of patients and 31% of caregivers reported the patient received guidance on management. The most frequently recommended interventions are listed in Table 1 ; 25% of patients reported that no interventions were recommended. Medication prescribed to treat nOH was reported by 34% of patients and 45% of caregivers. Among patients treated, 79% of patients and 71% of caregivers said that the patient’s symptoms were somewhat to very well managed. Conclusions: Survey findings suggest the need for increased awareness of nOH and engagement with patients and caregivers regarding symptom management. A variety of interventions were recommended; no single treatment approach was noted. Respondents felt nOH symptoms were at least somewhat well managed with treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".