P315 High symptom burden and impact on health-related quality of life in patients with Crohn’s perianal fistulas: results from a global burden of illness study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Perianal fistulas (PAF) are a common complication in Crohn’s disease (CD) and can be associated with an increased burden of illness. A global study was conducted to assess the burden of illness in patients with Crohn’s perianal fistulas (CPF) compared with patients with CD without PAF (non-PAF CD). Here we present patient symptom burden and impact on HRQoL. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in seven countries (France, Germany, Spain, UK, Canada, Australia and Japan) in patients aged ≥21 and ≤90 years with self-reported physician-diagnosed CD. Patients were classified as having non-PAF CD (cohort, 1) or CPF without PAF-related surgery (cohort, 2) or CPF with PAF-related surgery (cohort, 3). Customised questions and validated general and disease-specific patient-reported outcome data were collected via a, 45-min IRB/EC-approved web-enabled questionnaire. Symptom burden and impact on HRQoL were evaluated using the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ, scores, 1–7 [low–optimum] with, 2-week recall period) in all cohorts and Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistula (QoLAF, scores, 14–70 [low–high impact]) in cohorts, 2 and, 3. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results Of, 929 patients recruited (cohort, 1, n=620; cohort, 2, n=174; cohort, 3, n=135), 58–69% were male and, 55–67% were aged, 21–40 years across all cohorts. Cohorts, 2 and, 3 experienced a significantly higher frequency of CD-related complications than cohort, 1 (mean [standard deviation, SD]:, 9.4 [4.5] and, 11.1 [5.2] vs, 6.0 [4.1], respectively; both p <0.05, Table, 1) and had a higher number of CD-related surgeries (other than PAF-related surgeries) in the past, 12 months (mean [SD]:, 1.8 [1.1], p =0.109 and, 2.2 [1.3], p <0.0001 vs, 1.5 [0.9], respectively). In patients with CPF, a smaller proportion in cohort, 2 had active PAF vs cohort, 3 (136 [78%] vs, 119 [88%], respectively; p =0.022) and a smaller proportion had experience with post-treatment PAF recurrence/persistence in cohort, 2 vs cohort, 3 (84 [48%] vs, 80 [59%], respectively; p =0.055). Overall SIBDQ scores were significantly lower (worse) in cohorts, 2 and, 3 than in cohort, 1 (3.8 and, 3.7 vs, 4.1 respectively; both p <0.001). In patients with CPF, total QoLAF scores were comparable between cohorts, 2 and, 3 (41 and, 42, respectively), although patients in cohort, 3 had a significantly higher (worse) score in the physical impact domain compared with cohort, 2 (21 vs, 19, respectively; p <0.05). Conclusion In this large global study, we observed that patients with CPF had incrementally higher symptom burden, owing to both CD and PAF, compared with patients with non-PAF CD. For patients with CPF, there was no difference in HRQoL irrespective of whether they had received PAF-related surgery or not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".