MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207016795 · doi:10.7454/jts.v3i2.1039

MEDIA, GLOBALISASI DAN ANCAMAN TERORISME

2021· article· id· W4207016795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Terrorism Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyberspaceTerrorismComputer securityContext (archaeology)Order (exchange)Deterrence theoryCyber-attackInternet privacyPolitical scienceBusinessComputer scienceThe InternetLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advances in science and technology are also used by terrorist groups to carry out their actions, starting from propaganda, recruitment, training, communication, fundraising and even searching for information in the context of determining targets for terror attacks. In addition, along with changes in the pattern of recruiting and método acts of terror, it does not rule out the possibility of cyber terrorism attacks. This cyber terrorism attack will lead to vital facilities that are directly related to public services. Acts of terror through cyber attacks will have a wider impact and can even damage the system of a country. In order to fight cyber terrorism, what must be used is cyber counterterrorism capabilities. This can be done, among others, by cyber patrol (cyberspace), cyber deterrence, cyber prosecution and cyber surveillance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it