MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207033664 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2022.107863

The PaleoArchiNeo (PAN) human brain atlas: A dataset on a standard neuroanatomical MRI template following a phylogenetic approach

2022· article· en· W4207033664 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryna Zhernovaia, Mahsa Dadar, Sawsan M. Mahmoud, Yashar Zeighami, Josefina Maranzano

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)Brain atlasPhylogenetic treeHuman brainResearch articleComputer scienceBiologyArtificial intelligenceAnatomyNeuroscienceLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cortical atlases provide consistent divisions of the human cortex into areas that have common structural as well as meaningful and distinctive functional characteristics. They constitute a fundamental tool to study and quantify changes in healthy and pathological states. Historically, the most widely used atlases follow the cytoarchitecture described by Brodmann and/or the myeloarchitectonic characteristics described by Vogt-Vogt. These histological approaches have since been combined to the standard anatomical nomenclature of gyri and sulci, referring to the corresponding cytoarchitectonic area(s) present in a gyrus, when applicable or necessary (e.g. area 4 of Brodmann in the pre-central gyrus). More recently, common functional features depicted by resting state functional MRI have guided the division of the cortex into functional regions of interest. However, to date, there are no human MRI atlases that divide the cortex considering the common evolutionary changes experienced by the mammalian cortex. Hence, the present dataset describes the PaleoArchiNeo (PAN) Human Brain, a voxel-based atlas that divides the human cortex into five regions of interest (ROIs) following a phylogenetic approach: 1- archicortex, 2- paleocortex, 3- peri-archicortex, 4- proisocortex, 5- neocortex, and thirty neocortical sub-ROIs that follow the gyral Terminologia Anatomica.The masks of the ROIs and sub-ROIs were segmented on the T1-weighted MNI ICBM 152 2009c symmetric average brain MRI model, the latest version of the most widely used standard brain template. The segmentations have been performed manually by anatomist experts, following the MRI anatomical landmarks that have been previously described, correlated, and validated with histology by other groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207