MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207035086 · doi:10.1386/csfb_00031_3

Sizing up gender: Bringing the joy of fat, gender and fashion into focus

2021· article· en· W4207035086 on OpenAlexaff
Calla Evans, Mindy Stricke, Ben Barry, May Friedman

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Studies in Fashion and Beauty · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeSubject (documents)Embodied cognitionFeelingGender studiesAestheticsHuman sexualitySubject matterSociologyPsychologyVisual artsSocial psychologyArtComputer scienceLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This photo essay explores the intersections of gender, fatness and fashion through an innovative and evocative arts-based methodology involving collaboratively constructed macro, or close-up, photographs, portraits and garment images. With these images, we can examine people’s experiences at the intersections of fat and gender through one of the most visible and embodied ways by which we construct and resist dominant narratives about these subject positions: fashion and self-fashioning. The Sizing Up Gender project engaged twelve self-identified cis-gender, trans, non-binary and two-spirit fat people across diverse race, class and other subject positions. Their narratives disrupt many dominant understandings of fat bodies and fashion and introduce a joyfulness to the story of dressing fat bodies that has been sorely neglected. We connect these feelings of joy to the concept of fabulousness, and consider how our participants’ experiences of joy and risk are not only due to genders, races and sexualities but also to how these identities intersect with their fat embodiments, fatphobia and weight stigma. The images presented here, particularly the macro photographs, force us to look more closely at the subject matter at hand and introduce a visual fabulousness of their own, a fabulousness that is rarely afforded to fat bodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Studies in Fashion and BeautySame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207