Revisiting Lunotriquetral Arthrodesis in Chronic Lunotriquetral Ligamentous Injuries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Chronic lunotriquetral (LT) ligament tears are a source of ulnar-sided wrist pain. Left untreated, complete tears of the LT ligament may progress to a volar intercalated segment instability deformity and eventual carpal arthritis. Various treatments have been proposed, one of which is LT arthrodesis. LT arthrodesis has been criticized for high rates of nonunion frequently requiring reoperation, and therefore has largely fallen out of favor. However, our experience has been quite different from the literature. This study examines a single surgeon's experience with LT arthrodesis over a 15-year period. Methods A retrospective review of the senior author's practice over a 15-year period was performed. All adult cases of LT arthrodesis for chronic LT injuries were included. Headless compression screw and cancellous bone graft from the distal radius were used for primary arthrodesis in all cases. The primary outcome was rate of union, and secondary outcomes were time to union, secondary or salvage procedures, and range of motion. Nonparametric statistical analysis was used to calculate differences in outcomes. Results Twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 45.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 35–50) years and 75% were male. The dominant hand was most commonly affected. Eighty-six percent of patients achieved union, one patient required redo arthrodesis, and one patient went on to wrist salvage. Three patients developed a pain-free pseudoarthrosis. Median time to radiographic union was 8.8 (IQR 5.9–11.9) weeks. Conclusion Despite multiple previous reports, this study demonstrates that LT arthrodesis for chronic LT injuries is a safe technique with high rates of successful union. Further comparative studies are warranted to determine the optimal treatment for chronic LT injuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".