MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Federated Transfer Learning-Based IDS for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)

2021· article· en· W4207072427 on OpenAlexaff
Yazan Otoum, Yue Wan, Amiya Nayak

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThe InternetTransfer of learningWorld Wide WebTransfer (computing)MultimediaArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is a set of medical devices and applications that connect to healthcare systems through the Internet. Those devices are equipped with communication technologies that allow them to communicate with each other and the Internet. Reliance on the IoMT is increasing with the increase in epidemics and chronic diseases such as COVID-19 and diabetes; with the increase in the number of IoMT users and the need for electronic data sharing and virtual services, cyberattacks in the healthcare sector for accessing confidential patient data has been increasing in the recent years. The healthcare applications and their infrastructures have special requirements for handling sensitive users’ data and the need for high availability. Therefore, securing healthcare applications and data has attracted special attention from both industry and researchers. In this paper, we propose a Federated Transfer Learning-based Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to secure the patient’s healthcare-connected devices. The model uses Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithm for training the network and transferring the knowledge from the connected edge models to build an aggregated global model and customizing it for each one of the connected edge devices without exposing data privacy. CICIDS2017 dataset has been used to evaluate the performance in terms of accuracy, detection rate, and average training time. In addition to preserving data privacy of edge devices and achieving better performance, our comparison indicates that the proposed model can be generalized better and learns incrementally compared to other baseline ML/DL algorithms used in the traditional centralized learning schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)Same topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207