Single-cell ATAC-seq of fetal human retina and stem-cell-derived retinal organoids shows changing chromatin landscapes during cell fate acquisition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously used single-cell transcriptomic analysis to characterize human fetal retinal development and assessed the degree to which retinal organoids recapitulate normal development. We now extend the transcriptomic analyses to incorporate single-cell assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq), a powerful method used to characterize potential gene regulatory networks through the changes in accessible chromatin that accompany cell-state changes. The combination of scATAC-seq and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides a view of developing human retina at an unprecedented resolution. We identify key transcription factors relevant to specific fates and the order of the transcription factor cascades that define each of the major retinal cell types. The changing chromatin landscape is largely recapitulated in retinal organoids; however, there are differences in Notch signaling and amacrine cell gene regulation. The datasets we generated constitute an excellent resource for the continued improvement of retinal organoid technology and have the potential to inform and accelerate regenerative medicine approaches to retinal diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it