Representations in the Learning of Sequences and Regularities by Third-Grade Portuguese Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to their abstract nature, representation of mathematical concepts through different registers favors their understanding. In the case of ''sequences and regularities'', it becomes propitious the exploration of different registers of representation in the institution of topics, such as term, order, formation law, and generating expression. Considering these assumptions, a teaching experiment was performed to understand the contribution of multiple representations in the learning of ''sequences and regularities'' by 3rd-grade students. The study adopted a qualitative methodology and the findings of the study reveal that students initially presented a smaller variety of representations, which increased during the teaching experience. Students showed a greater preference for pictorial representations and made explicit connections between different representations throughout their resolutions. Pictorial representations and tables allowed close and distant generalizations, the determination of the formation law, and the generating expression. The greatest difficulties of the students resulted from the interpretation of the statements of the proposed tasks, which were also evident in the representation (natural language), showing a greater number of incorrect answers. This result shows that some students still have difficulties in justifying their reasoning, either in writing or orally. 2008). Duval (2012) argues that the lack of understanding of representations necessarily causes a misunderstanding
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".