MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210242118 · doi:10.24124/2021/59224

Modelling snowpacks in topographically complex terrain during the winter accumulation season, Columbia River Basin, British Columbia, Canada

2021· dissertation· en· W4210242118 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marzieh Mortezapour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsSnowGlacierWeather Research and Forecasting ModelClimatologyEnvironmental scienceGlacier mass balanceSnow lineSnowpackTerrainClimate changePhysical geographyAtmospheric sciencesSnow coverMeteorologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation investigates winter accumulation and snow cover change in the Columbia Mountains of British Columbia. In chapter 1, I start with an introduction that describes the study area, and then outlines the objectives and structure of this dissertation. In chapter 2, I examine the performance of two snow evolution models with different complexities (SnowModel and Alpine3D) at simulating winter glacier mass balance on four individual glaciers using two different forcing datasets, the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) outputs and the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS). My results show that both models can simulate winter accumulation with less than 20% bias for each glacier, with SnowModel forced by WRF yielding the least overall bias. In chapter 3, I study the effect of wind on snow patterns to determine the impact of snow redistribution by wind in terms of erosion, deposition, and sublimation on winter mass balance estimation. The results demonstrate that modelled redistribution of snow by wind produces a visually realistic pattern of snow accumulation when compared to observed snow depth, but its impact on the glacier-averaged winter mass balance estimation is negligible (< 4%). The results also suggest that drifting snow sublimation is highly time and space dependent. Considering the model performance from previous chapters, in chapter 4, I analyzed the future snow cover change over the upper Columbia Basin under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP8.5) climate scenario by the end of the 21st century. I used downscaled climate projections of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) by WRF, along with statistically downscaled data provided from the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium (PCIC) to force SnowModel. The simulated snow maps represent a higher dynamically downscaled mean snow water equivalent (SWE) reduction – reaching up to 30% by the end of the century - than the statistically downscaled SWE reduction. While SWE reduction of more than 60% happens at lower and mid-elevations, altitudes higher than 2000 m are less vulnerable to climate change. I conclude this dissertation (Chapter 5) with a summary of the progress gained, study limitations, suggestions for future research, and research implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→