Jasmonate regulates seed dormancy in wheat via modulating the balance between gibberellin and abscisic acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jasmonate (JA) regulates seed dormancy and germination; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Furthermore, it is unclear if JA is an essential regulator of dormancy and germination. We investigated whether the role of JA in regulating seed dormancy in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is mediated by modulation of gibberellin (GA)/abscisic acid (ABA) balance and if the reciprocal modulation of JA level and sensitivity is required for GA-mediated dormancy loss using physiological, pharmacological, and targeted transcriptomic and metabolomic approaches. JA-induced dormancy release in wheat seeds was associated with no change in GA level but up-regulation of GA signaling and ABA catabolism genes, and reduction of the ABA level. Although JA did not affect the expression levels of ABA signaling genes, up-regulation of germination-associated genes indicates a contribution of reduced ABA sensitivity to dormancy release. After-ripening-mediated dormancy loss was also associated with JA-GA synergistic and JA-ABA antagonistic interplays. The prevalence of no effect of GA, which effectively broke dormancy, on the JA-Ile level and expression patterns of JA biosynthesis/signaling and responsive genes reflects that GA-mediated dormancy release occurs independently of JA. Our study concludes that JA induces seed dormancy release in wheat via modulating ABA/GA balance; however, JA is not an essential regulator of dormancy and germination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".