Unilateral transfemoral amputees exhibit altered strength and dynamics of muscular co-activation modulated by visual feedback
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Somatosensory perception is disrupted in patients with a lower limb amputation. This increases the difficulty to maintain balance and leads to the development of neuromuscular adjustments. We investigated how these adjustments are reflected in the co-activation of lower body muscles and are modulated by visual feedback. Approach. We measured electromyography (EMG) signals of muscles from the trunk (erector spinae and obliquus external), and the lower intact/dominant leg (tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius) in 11 unilateral transfemoral amputees and 11 age-matched able-bodied controls during 30 s of upright standing with and without visual feedback. Muscle synergies involved in balance control were investigated using wavelet coherence analysis. We focused on seven frequencies grouped in three frequency bands, a low-frequency band (7.56 and 19.86 Hz) representing more sub-cortical and spinal inputs to the muscles, a mid-frequency band (38.26 and 62.63 Hz) representing more cortical inputs, and a high-frequency band (92.90, 129 and 170.90 Hz) associated with synchronizing motor unit action potentials. Further, the dynamics of changes in intermuscular coupling over time were quantified using the Entropic Half-Life. Main results. Amputees exhibited lower coherency values when vision was removed at 7.56 Hz for the muscle pair of the lower leg. At this frequency, the coherency values of the amputee group also differed from controls for the eyes closed condition. Controls and amputees exhibited opposite coherent behaviors with visual feedback at 7.56 Hz. For the eyes open condition at 129 Hz, the coherency values of amputees and controls differed for the muscle pair of the trunk, and at 170.90 Hz for the muscle pair of the lower leg. Amputees exhibited different dynamics of muscle co-activation at the low frequency band when vision was available. Significance. Altogether, these findings point to the development of neuromuscular adaptations reflected in the strength and dynamics of muscular co-activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".